The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Law Firm Sues Associates for Not Billing Enough
Poast new message in this thread
Date: December 8th, 2022 9:50 PM Author: Lilac hateful stead puppy https://abovethelaw.com/2022/12/law-firm-sues-associates-for-not-billing-enough/ (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5249880&forum_id=2#45606574) |
Date: December 8th, 2022 9:52 PM Author: Wonderful Theater Stage Lol (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5249880&forum_id=2#45606582) |
 |
Date: December 8th, 2022 9:54 PM Author: Adventurous center jewess The law is $acred (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5249880&forum_id=2#45606594) |
|
Date: December 8th, 2022 9:53 PM Author: Pearl Crackhouse sounds like the firm can’t lose. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5249880&forum_id=2#45606588) |
|
Date: December 9th, 2022 12:57 AM Author: Lilac hateful stead puppy (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5249880&forum_id=2#45607435) |
|
Date: December 9th, 2022 1:00 AM Author: maize insane legend theatre That can’t really be enforceable, “appropriately and at the discretion” is meaningless (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5249880&forum_id=2#45607442) |
|
Date: December 9th, 2022 1:29 AM Author: trip bonkers tank The firm already won. It's enforceable. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5249880&forum_id=2#45607478) |
|
Date: December 9th, 2022 2:19 AM Author: red thriller candlestick maker Those are also often good cracks to shove a good faith and fair dealing violation into (or a prevention doctrine defense). If the firm wasn't providing enough work, it can't claim breach. But I don't know enough about the facts or the agreement. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5249880&forum_id=2#45607530) |
|
Date: December 9th, 2022 1:53 AM Author: Curious crotch national Litigation associates are spoiled (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5249880&forum_id=2#45607509) |
|
Date: December 9th, 2022 1:57 AM Author: plum theater *Requests conflicts waiver to bill in case against himself* (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5249880&forum_id=2#45607515) |
|
Date: December 9th, 2022 1:58 AM Author: boyish navy lettuce Oh what a “profession” lmao (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5249880&forum_id=2#45607517) |
|
Date: December 9th, 2022 4:19 AM Author: galvanic site https://www.bismarcklaw.com/meet-the-team phenotypes here are indicative of a shakedown operation |
|
Date: December 9th, 2022 2:28 AM Author: Soul-stirring step-uncle's house Burckhard received a base salary of $60,200 per year in exchange for agreeing to bill at least 27 hours per week. See [Doc ID# 9, 10.] [¶ 8] Burckhard did not dispute the damages calculation in either his Declaration or MSJ Response. See [Doc ID# 22, 23.] In fact, he admitted he was credited with 1,423.22 hours. See [Doc ID# 22], “second” ¶ 4. He did not specifically deny being credited with 108.33 holiday hours, but merely denied any overpayment had been made. Compare Compl., [Doc ID# 1], ¶ 9, with Answer [Doc ID# 17], ¶ 7; see also [Doc ID# 10], (under column titled “Holidays”). These figures resulted in a total of 1,531.55 hours credited to him during his employment. He also admitted that he was paid for 2,229.43 hours at the rate of $42.75 per hour. Compare [Doc ID# 1], ¶ 8, with [Doc ID# 17], ¶ 7. Thus, there was no dispute that he was paid $96,316.54, but his actual earned salary based on his billable hours was $65,431.16, resulting in a $29,885.38 shortfall (i.e., he was 697.88 hours short of his required billable hours for the amount he was paid). |
|
Date: December 9th, 2022 4:07 AM Author: galvanic site JFC, there was a link.... and it was real HONK HONK! |