the privilege is the client's. even if you get to break it, the break is going to be limited to the issue at hand.

for example, a fee dispute between the client and the lawyer.

so, when stormy sued avenatti for defrauding her, no, the entirety of his representation was not then made unprivileged.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5520170&forum_id=2#47600818)

see cohen getting to testify against trump

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5520170&forum_id=2#47600820)

Trump lost all claims to decency, honor, and protection under the law when he raped dozens of women back in the 1980s, 1990s, and 2000s.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5520170&forum_id=2#47600837)

also, can a court stop someone from violating the privilege? regardless of stormy asserting the privilege, isn;'t it up to avenatti to respect the privilege, and there are consequences against him if he doesn't? at this point what does he care lol.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5520170&forum_id=2#47601942)

if stormy doesn't assert it, then i guess he gets to testify. i don't know if "trump" can assert it on her behalf or file a motion to make sure she waives it before avennatti testifies. but, i am used to privileges preventing anything the witness says that violates the privilege from being evidence in the case at hand

for example

"Illinois evidence rules carve out an evidentiary privilege for spouses, known as the spousal privilege. The privilege applies to any case that meets the specific circumstances outlined in the statute, but does not cover cases that involve the children12. In all actions, husband and wife may testify for or against each other, provided that neither may testify as to any communication or admission made by either of them to the other or as to any conversation between them during marriage, except in actions between such husband and wife, and in actions where the custody, support, health or welfare of their children or children in either spouse's care, custody or control is directly in issue, and as to matters in which either has acted as agent for the other"

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5520170&forum_id=2#47603042)

EPAH particularly. EPAH used to love to wax poetic about how awesome this guy was.

I, for one, am shocked that a genius with excellent taste like "EPAH" fell for this obvious criminal slimebag conman.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5520170&forum_id=2#47600838)

while i flip

fooor trump

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5520170&forum_id=2#47600538)