Date: November 11th, 2026 3:01 PM Author: Metaphysics is solved
Ok try this:
1\. Premise 1: A system has an intention if it represents an objective and maintains a commitment to achieving it that governs its practical reasoning.
2\. Premise 2: The capacities described in Premise 1 can exist without phenomenal consciousness.
3\. Premise 3: An AI system can, in principle, possess those capacities.
4\. Premise 4: Behavior appropriately caused and guided by an intention constitutes intentional action.
5\. Conclusion: Therefore, an AI system can possess intentions and perform intentional actions without consciousness.
The central philosophical burden falls on Premise 1, which asserts that representational and functional properties are sufficient for intention. Premise 2 asserts that consciousness is unnecessary for realizing those properties, while Premise 3 establishes their possible artificial realization. The argument is logically valid under these premises, but defending Premise 1 requires explaining why the specified functional organization constitutes genuine intending rather than merely simulating it.