Date: November 10th, 2020 2:18 PM Author: vigorous nibblets stead
Ray Tomlinson, computer programmer at ARPA. I suppose an argument could be made for Kleinrock, too. But Tomlinson developed the @ system (user@network) in 1971 (when this Shiva guy would've been 7 years old) and typically gets credit.
Date: November 10th, 2020 6:13 PM Author: greedy dun spot
In January 1985, two armed robbers broke into Drescher and Jacobson's Los Angeles apartment. While one ransacked their home, Drescher and a female friend were raped by the other at gunpoint. Jacobson was also physically attacked, tied up, and forced to witness the entire ordeal. ...
After separating in 1996, Drescher and Jacobson divorced in 1999. They had no children. Drescher has worked to support LGBT rights issues after her former husband came out.
Date: November 10th, 2020 2:39 PM Author: Metaphysics Is solved
data analysis shows that as precincts in Detroit county increased in % republican (as deduced from straight ticket voting), the percent of votes for trump that were not straight ticket decreased linearly. put differently, as a precinct became more republican, the % of individual votes for Biden increased. the software for this algorithm ("weighted race" voting) has been installed on voting machines since 2001
Date: November 10th, 2020 4:05 PM Author: galvanic location
This is my obsession. The outcome determinative factor seems to be insane numbers of no-downvote Biden ballots in certain areas of swing states.
Are you saying they appeared in anomalous numbers in the more pro-Trump precincts?
If so, that's consistent with a rather cunning plan to seed no-downvote Biden ballots where they hoped they'd go under the radar.
The whole "observers at 10 feet rather than 6" complaint is small and speculative.
The number of no-downvote Biden ballots in just the key states and in just the key cities where Dems ran the shit is a smoking gun, if it can be proven.
For what it's worth, this is what Sidney Powell and a few others have focused on. Me too.
Date: November 10th, 2020 4:39 PM Author: Metaphysics Is solved
yes, the prevalence of unexpected biden votes appeared anomalously in pro-trump areas. the more pro-trump, the more anomalous.
i dont know if they were flipping votes or feeding in votes. this analysis would be agnostic on the question and they dont look at the voting pattern (probably dont have the data) on non-straight-ticket ballots
3 graphs. each blue dot is a precinct. x-axis is a precinct's republicanism as measured by the ratio of straight ticket repub vs. dem votes in this election. blue dots plots the difference between the % of unaffiliated (not-straight-ticket ballots) for trump vs. the straight-ticket expectation. that shows by how much unaffiliated voters deviated from the straight-ticket expectation in that precinct.
The first graph is if unaffiliated ballots voted similarly to the straight-ticket split in the precinct.
The second graph shows what would happen if e.g. on average 10% of republicans voted Biden
The third (real data) graph shows that as a precinct became more republican in expectation, the percentage of unaffiliated votes for Biden got bigger against the "control group" of straight ballot voters.
Date: November 10th, 2020 5:26 PM Author: Metal submissive sex offender office
I've been saying it - this is how the election was stole. There were more voters in the trump precincts, but they decreased his margins and inflated the voter base to skew biden.
Date: November 10th, 2020 5:35 PM Author: passionate corner messiness
This is exactly what you would expect to happen. In a 100% dem precinct, the percent of Biden/reptile ballots would be 0%. It would go up the higher reptile the precinct is.
Date: November 10th, 2020 5:38 PM Author: galvanic location
Not aruging yet, but I want to break down his claim. I thought he's claiming that in the pro-Dem areas, Trump does 7% better than other Republicans. That would show that Trump has cross-over appeal and should be a prediction that Trump will absolutely kill it in the more conservative areas.
But he says that when you move into heavy pro-Trump areas, you suddenly start seeing ballots for Biden. Maybe even no-downvote Biden ballots. Why are they there?
Date: November 10th, 2020 5:44 PM Author: passionate corner messiness
This is xo and I’m Epah. I start by arguing, then fill in the gaps. I didn’t watch the video, I’m just talking about the quote above. It’s not explained well enough to make any point.
But I don’t think your logic holds, and I think it’s on a different point than the quote. I don’t think there’s any reason to expect that Drumpf would get more crossover votes than the big guy would. For example, there’s no analog to the Lincoln Project or Republicans for Biden on the lib side.
Date: November 10th, 2020 5:59 PM Author: Metaphysics Is solved
the expectation is if there is crossover voting it would be similar across precincts. what theyre finding is there is more crossover (as a PERCENT) in repub areas
so if there are 3 areas A1, A2, A3 with republican straight-ticket (compared to dem straight ticket) of 70%, 50% and 30%, you'd expect e.g. 10% of republicans in each areas to break for biden. what they're finding is in the 70% repub areas, 30% of repubs are breaking for biden, in the 50% areas, 20% and in the 30%, 10%.
we're talking about the % of republican breaking for biden. Why is there a higher % of republicans breaking for biden in republican areas?
And what you're seeing is the % change compared to the % republican is LINEAR. that kind of relationship is an anomaly explainable POSSIBLY by algorithmic intervention
Date: November 10th, 2020 2:48 PM Author: Metaphysics Is solved
this dude sued in MA for SS to retain ballot images for computer counted votes. lost. lmao. literally a factory setting on voting machines, and federal law requires they be saved for 22 month. roffle
Date: November 10th, 2020 7:12 PM Author: trip gaping
I am in the fraudmo camp but;
Honest Question: Does it not make sense that as a Precinct votes Repub down ballot more, it makes it more likely that a negative Trump gap would emerge?
Like imagine a precinct that voted 100% Repub downballot. It would be impossible for Trump to ever outperform (he could only get 100% himself or less than that).
I might just be an idiot who has not spent enough time thinking about this.
Date: November 10th, 2020 7:50 PM Author: galvanic location
That's not what I understand they're claiming.
First they look at the % of pure party line voting and plot that running from left to right. Then they look at how Trump did along that spectrum. Turns out that Trump had unexpected support among Dems, so those areas he's above the line.
So let's look at the trend as we move toward what are increasingly Republican-dominated precincts.
We'd expect to see no significant defections from Trump given the strength of his popularity among Republicans and his unexpected support among Democrats.
But if for some reason some Republicans had grown tired of Trump in an organic way, you'd see the Trump dots below the line but in a flat pattern running from left to right.
That is, there's no reason to believe that in a precinct with 40% partyline GOP voting you'd see (1) a higher rate of defections from Trump than in a 30% partyline GOP precinct, and (2) a lower rate of defections from Trump than in a 50% partyline GOP district. You'd see the same rate of defections. You'd see a flat line.
Moreover, as you moved to the most pro-Republican precincts of all, you'd never expect to see Trump support among Republicans plummet.
Date: November 11th, 2020 12:33 AM Author: Medicated Base Karate
FYI, just came out: The ballots they want tossed in Michigan aren’t from Detroit, they are from the conservative half of the state, based on the filing. Fits with this theory.
Date: November 11th, 2020 12:37 AM Author: Medicated Base Karate
Exactly. Makes sense, even though it’s not what you’d think at first—“oh, of course most of the corruption must be in Detroit”. And there probably was the usual ballot stuffing there, but what if the large scale stuff was elsewhere?
Worth nothing that PA+MI still leaves Trump at 268 EV. Gotta flip something else too.... maybe the Georgia recount? AZ isn’t looking likely.
Date: November 11th, 2020 7:38 AM Author: Jade Station
Odd case, because just yesterday Rudy said all the fraud was in Detroit, Milwaukee, Pittsburgh, and Philadelphia and other "crooked Democrat cities" on Newsmax.
Mr. President @realDonaldTrump & Mr. Biden @JoeBiden
Our analysis in Michigan indicates a computer algorithm was likely used to transfer 69,000 votes. We are willing to subject our results to a critical & transparent review with your representatives. Are you open?
Date: November 11th, 2020 4:23 PM Author: vigorous nibblets stead
GOP just needs to show there was significant fraud to set the inevitable in motion. It's like staying with a partner who you know cheated on you. Even if you stay with them, you'll never trust them again and that will ultimately sabotage the relationship.