The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
    6 posters qualify.
You have 0 points. Copying this list does not send funds. Paste it on Disperse, then connect your wallet there. |
cons why’d you suddenly lose interest in the Epstein story?
Poast new message in this thread
Date: August 8th, 2026 7:24 AM Author: Avocado violent mental disorder that was all you talked about for 2-3 years (https://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5890651&forum_id=2#50053077) |
Date: August 8th, 2026 8:00 AM Author: big new version Iirc a bunch of libs/Jews like Bill Gates, Larry Summers, Howard Lutnick, Bill Clinton, and Noam Chomsky were implicated. Trump got mentioned 5000k times but no one believes anything he gets accused of anymore.
Everything I’ve seen and the rumors back in the 2010s were that it was the Lolita Express, not the child rapist express imho
Virginia Guiffre’s death being shady as fuck makes me think that someone we know did it, Andrew or Clinton idk, shit was insane
Epstein and Trump weren’t friends imo. They were like Roosh and Roissy. If they ever met after their Falling Out, it would be like the diner scene in Heat. |
 |
Date: August 8th, 2026 8:55 AM Author: Avocado violent mental disorder wow that’s an impressive amount of mental gymnastics to convince yourself Trump didn’t fuck kids (https://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5890651&forum_id=2#50053139) |
|
Date: August 8th, 2026 9:05 AM Author: big new version There are no kids unless they killed all of them imo (https://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5890651&forum_id=2#50053153) |
|
Date: August 8th, 2026 1:10 PM Author: irradiated bisexual theatre bbw They did (https://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5890651&forum_id=2#50053510) |
|
Date: August 8th, 2026 1:08 PM Author: Avocado violent mental disorder (https://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5890651&forum_id=2#50053506) |
|
Date: August 8th, 2026 1:14 PM Author: Angry Home Honest answer? It seems like all these chicks were of age and the ones who weren’t were like 16 or 17 which is legal in most US states. Inappropriate for people of power? Yes. But if a 16 year old can walk around with her cheeks hanging out in these new shorts every chick wears, she has the agency to do what they’re accusing. Morally. So not a big deal as the headline implies. Natural male instinct vs something you turn away and can’t look at (like if it was a younger age). (https://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5890651&forum_id=2#50053519) |
|
Date: August 8th, 2026 1:17 PM Author: Avocado violent mental disorder that wasnt your view 24 months ago. you guys loved talking about it then (https://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5890651&forum_id=2#50053525) |
|
Date: August 8th, 2026 1:28 PM Author: Angry Home Who is “you guys?” I always scratched my head when they would say he was trafficking kids then they would show a blurred photo of some chick with a full adult body. If it’s human trafficking that’s one thing but they’re saying “kids” yet I’ve heard 1 or 2 stories about an actual underage chick and then I see the age and it’s like 16 or 17. Bad? Yes. But not shocking to the sense it was reported. (https://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5890651&forum_id=2#50053551) |
|
Date: August 8th, 2026 1:36 PM Author: big new version Libs think that cons and everyone who hates them are all one Bloc because libs are a Block
Trump 2024 voters run the gamut from Scum/spics/Shy Tories/Jocks/like 80% of white guys/Gen X guys who say they voted Kamala to keep the peace. all of these people hate libs for Multivariate reasons imho. |
|
Date: August 8th, 2026 1:30 PM Author: chrome death wish ratface The real answer is that an outrage cycle must be connected to physical action in the real world to sustain the interest and momentum
Jews let the news about Epstein out but didn’t let that result in any prosecutions and then stopped covering it, so the story died
This happens to literally any story that isn’t tied to continued real world action |
|
Date: August 8th, 2026 1:34 PM Author: big new version who else would there even be left to protect by there being a Cover-up? a shitload of e-mails came out. The names I mentioned all got pwned. maybe More Powerful Jews got redacted. but idk I know the royal family is fake but Prince Andrew would be seen as a person of some sort of consequence, worth covering up. in your humble opinion (iyho) do the Rothschilds get first dibs on Redactions? (https://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5890651&forum_id=2#50053557) |
|
Date: August 8th, 2026 1:36 PM Author: chrome death wish ratface They can’t do prosecutions because it would so quickly morph into being about Israel. Ehud Barak basically lived at Epsteins lol (https://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5890651&forum_id=2#50053559) |
|
Date: August 8th, 2026 10:03 PM Author: spectacular gay wizard genital piercing JD Vance gave some common sense on this - Epstein was first arrested in 2006. That's when he was released because he "belonged to intelligence."
Let's assume the most likely conspiracy is true - Epstein was a honeypot for Mossad.
You think that either (i) Mossad just left the evidence out there for 20 years or (ii) Epstein kept engaging in the same tactics as an asset after his arrest?
The "Epstein files" had some weird stuff and interesting gossip, but it clearly has no answers to any of the interesting questions about Epstein. |