The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
 14 posters qualify.
You have 0 points. Copying this list does not send funds. Paste it on Disperse, then connect your wallet there. |
HYPO: 12+ GOP senators + Vance strike grand bargain to remove Trump
Poast new message in this thread
Date: November 5th, 2026 10:08 PM Author: Wow tough day for libs In 2027, with 56 Dem senators, they cut a deal for impeachment and conviction + ban on blormpf running again: - end Iran war - continue Ukraine war - Medicare for most + expanded rural healthcare - stricter controls against Chinese meth and opioids - all Trump cabinet members gone with no Vance pardons to them or any Trump family - beginning process to amend Constitution to ban stock trading by federal electeds and officials + rein in pardon power a bit + SCOTUS term limits of some kind
Get a combination of mega olds like Grassley, women like Murkowski, and ultra safe bros who couldn't be primaried by vengeful blormpf (maybe Dems even have side deal to not go hard against those bros next time even if Trump pwns them ... Focus on people who aren't running for another 4 or 6 years).
I bet you could get a dozen, and if writing was on the wall, many more would find it in their political interest to join so their next opponent can't say they are Trump stooges.
Vance's motivation is obviously to be POTUS and clear the field for his 2028 run.
|
Date: November 5th, 2026 10:38 PM Author: Dickey Simpkins Wouldn’t the dems rather just let Trump continue to sink the Republican Party to new lows in popularity and then take over full control in 2028? Why prop up Vance? (https://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5919337&forum_id=2#50236360) |
 |
Date: November 5th, 2026 10:43 PM Author: Wow tough day for libs Yes they would. Just like they could have codified a federal abortion law in 2009-10 but forgot to I guess (https://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5919337&forum_id=2#50236369) |
|
Date: November 5th, 2026 10:47 PM Author: ferengi (https://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5919337&forum_id=2#50236390) |
|
Date: November 6th, 2026 9:17 AM Author: Dickey Simpkins They didn’t have the votes.
Many of the dems were from purple or even red states and politics wasn’t toxic enough yet that filibuster removal was on the table. |
|
Date: November 5th, 2026 10:41 PM Author: ..,,....,,.,..,,..,,...,...,,....,..., It's funny you want to continue Ukraine and think this is realistic (https://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5919337&forum_id=2#50236365) |
|
Date: November 5th, 2026 10:45 PM Author: Wow tough day for libs ?? It's a hypo. Tried to think of stuff that dems want that Vance could give.
|
|
Date: November 6th, 2026 8:27 AM Author: ohnoes (🧐) He's very dumb (https://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5919337&forum_id=2#50236993) |
|
Date: November 5th, 2026 10:47 PM Author: management consultant neither dems nor gops have any reason to agree to that (https://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5919337&forum_id=2#50236389) |
|
Date: November 5th, 2026 10:53 PM Author: Tirant Lo Blanc Vance is young, with young children and a careerist brown wife. I could see him wanting lib acceptance like GWB got eventually. A Gerald Ford style unity and healing thing could appeal to him. (https://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5919337&forum_id=2#50236405) |
|
Date: November 6th, 2026 8:25 AM Author: MAGA's Prolapsed Anus (https://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5919337&forum_id=2#50236989) |
|
Date: November 5th, 2026 10:57 PM Author: peeface uh, you see the GOP having to buy off the DNC with concessions to get their support for impeachment? what?
|
|
Date: November 5th, 2026 11:10 PM Author: Wow tough day for libs Not really concessions when otherwise ur spending the next 2 years with orange retard fucking ur chances to win in 28 Plus from a realist standpoint as noted above, libs would much prefer keeping Trump around until 28 for that very reason. |
|
Date: November 6th, 2026 8:24 AM Author: Risten Even the safest of safe GOP senators would be risking their careers. Right now there's zero chance that e.g. the Idaho bros lose re-election (Crapo in 28, Risch in 32). But if Trump and AIPAC made it their mission to take them out, they would have to be pretty goddamn worried. (Risch will be 89 when his term ends so maybe he's in the mega old category but you never know with these freaks. Probably likes blormpf anyway) (https://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5919337&forum_id=2#50236987) |
|
Date: November 6th, 2026 9:12 AM Author: UhOh (https://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5919337&forum_id=2#50237114) |
|
Date: November 6th, 2026 9:16 AM Author: Brussels Sprout (Apropos of the Wet Snow) provided that JD thinks like a lawyer and uses the provisions under the Constitution shielding him from Trump's wrath and enables him to replace an unfit President-- there is hope for the GOP (https://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5919337&forum_id=2#50237125) |
|
Date: November 6th, 2026 9:18 AM Author: Accurate at predicting vs Measures of probability (gunneratttt) More people would be willing to cross the aisle on those issues that wouldn't be for impeaching Trump. If a veto-proof coalition emerges they'd just pass the laws, why bother impeaching Trump at that point for no reason? If he declined to enforce the laws they passed that would be a legitimate reason for impeachment. (https://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5919337&forum_id=2#50237131) |
|
Date: November 6th, 2026 9:19 AM Author: frank rizzo this is the dumbest thing I've read this week (https://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5919337&forum_id=2#50237134) |