What were you doing on Thanksgiving?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5641336&forum_id=2#48393905)

Can’t speak for HATP, but I was traveling abroad for business and had time on thanksgiving. The thread gave me a chance to practice roasting someone again, I had fun.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5641336&forum_id=2#48394190)

Case in point

http://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5601017&mc=175&forum_id=2

Thumbpoasting so this is probably going to be incoherent, but whatever.

So a lot of you have probably noticed me radfem poasting recently, and while that's mostly just flame to stir the pot, there's some truth to it. I haven't had a boyfriend for years now, and it's not because I'm ugly. I just don't want to deal with men. Of course some are Handsome and all that, but ultimately they're all sex-obsessed, porn-addicted pests that want to violate women.

When I met MPA in Boston, I was honestly impressed by how articulate and gregarious he was. But there was an undercurrent through the entire conversation that felt "off". He kept talking down his ex-wife, and I don't really know what the point is. Yeah, he's being a good Catholic and getting an annulment (which will probably be granted) but there's no need to backbite this woman. It was to the point whwre it seemed like his entire recent life was built on defying her and justifying the divorce. Again, I get that's it's a big deal, but wtf? Was this his way of flirting with me? Like, "Yeah, you're Asian but I'd rather be with you than this white b*tch" It was weird.

Anyway, the "sexual awakening" part. I've never seen so many rich, aloof NESCAC girls in my life and basically I want a yuri relationship where they kabe-don me and call me ugly while secretly caring for me. /braindump

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5641336&forum_id=2#48394237)

If you found the one would you engage in premarital sex?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5641336&forum_id=2#48390503)

your poast reeks of desperation

you basically say: if she would want you, you totally would

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5641336&forum_id=2#48391206)

This thread is purely done as a favor to help her move forward in life. I'm that nice a guy.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5641336&forum_id=2#48391245)

Without knowing her specifically, the fundamental problem I see generally with girls in her position is that they treat the faith a la carte. Good Catholic women of years past would not simultaneously demand chastity and a strong faith in their future husband while refusing to submit to a good man who doesn't give them the tingles.

Again, I don't know FizzKid, but generally speaking, they have secular mate preferences (tall, handsome, exciting, equal partnership, mutual submission, etc) but demand the man restrain himself in accordance with traditional norms.

If we took a time machine back to a traditional Catholic society 500 years ago in France, a non-asian FizzKid would have had a semi arranged marriage with the boy who lived next door to her in their small 500 person town. She wouldn't be travelling around to various cities meeting up with various men seeing which ones tickle her fancy.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5641336&forum_id=2#48391188)

You are right though that like most women, regardless of whether they are a blue haired libtard or a religiously minded more conservative, Fizz is hypergamous.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5641336&forum_id=2#48391247)

Women live on attention, which this board loves to give. I'm telling everyone here as a PSA that this mid, boring AZN bitch is just trotting out xo-bait to get attention/leverage her position as Queen of the Losers.

Its the same strategy as that annoying crypto bitch, Tiffany Fong

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5641336&forum_id=2#48391256)

its the same as any woman who gains proficiency in a male technical field or hobby. there's plenty of women with like a math or physics PhD. however, in 99% of cases it was merely a means to an end - their true interest was not in Physics itself but towards a job, virtue signal (we wuz hidden figures), or in some cases, a man.

this is evidenced again by the obvious lack of innovation of women in any male technical fields. if she shut the fuck up about her stupid personal life, didn't meet poasters, and merely was a religious SCHOLARSHIP-mo, i'd have a lot more respect for your theory

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5641336&forum_id=2#48391591)

bbooom is a wheelchair bound invalid

i'm a drug addled, sex obsessed maniac

zurich is hiv+ and fucking trannies

fizzkid is an icy bitch with squat champ thighs

evan is a gay grocery store clerk

lex drank himself down to sub 100iq

jcm is a 400lb target manager with a smelly twat

it's all real. all of it.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5641336&forum_id=2#48405474)

Go eat some rice and duck you ugly moon faced bitch

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5641336&forum_id=2#48391292)

Also she’s a chink not a gook

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5641336&forum_id=2#48391326)

I don’t know if being chad but clueless would be worth it

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5641336&forum_id=2#48391346)

Some rapacious cunt like FizzKid wants a Tom Brady to suck the life force out of

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5641336&forum_id=2#48391352)

Also, don’t marry a woman who is not a devout Christian.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5641336&forum_id=2#48391359)

You can shred a pre-nup particularly if your feminist judge thinks its inequitable (hint: anything favoring the man is unless you have a K-Fed arrangement)

Just watch how fast your "devout Christian tradwife" turns into a harridan in divorce court

See Steven Crowder. His wife was a virgin, Catholic, and she basically has aired his dirty laundry, accused him of abuse, and is out for blood

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5641336&forum_id=2#48391362)

You may be surprised to learn that in many cases, as long as you meet certain qualifications, you may be entitled to receive alimony, even if you were never married to your partner. Some of the factors that NJ courts consider to determine whether you were truly cohabitants and whether you may receive alimony are as follows:

Whether you have commingled finances, such as having jointly-held bank accounts and other joint holdings or liabilities;

Whether you and your partner shared joint responsibility for living expenses;

Whether your friends and families recognized your relationship as legitimate;

Whether you and your partner lived together;

The duration of your relationship (the longer your relationship, the higher the likelihood that you may be awarded alimony);

Whether you and your partner contributed to daily chores around the house; and

What you and your partner do for a living, as well as both of your annual incomes.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5641336&forum_id=2#48391371)

LJL at a man ever debunking this claim in court

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5641336&forum_id=2#48391383)

see Danny Masterson

or that our President Elect "raped" some woman in the mid 1990s. millions as judgment.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5641336&forum_id=2#48391395)

roll the dice buddy

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5641336&forum_id=2#48391401)

“My chad privilege is so extreme it extends beyond sex to existing beyond the bounds of law itself”

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5641336&forum_id=2#48391417)

"I am one with the Chad, the Chad is with me"

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5641336&forum_id=2#48391431)

To understand palimony in California, it is crucial to recognize that it is contingent upon the existence of an agreement between the partners. This agreement can be oral, written, or implied by the couple’s conduct. Unlike alimony, there are no preset formulas or guidelines for determining palimony, making the legal framework complex and heavily reliant on the specifics of each case.

https://minellalawgroup.com/blog/the-truth-about-common-law-marriage-palimony-in-california

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5641336&forum_id=2#48391471)

Its really a horror show and a sign of these (((Times))) that this kind of person and her expectations actually exist rather than being elaborate flame to annoy xo

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5641336&forum_id=2#48391356)

https://youtu.be/_-Q7sO98gkM?t=407

A woman like her has such a pathological ego and conceit that she will NEVER think she deserves less. She's so delusional and self centered (to the point of sociopathy) that any action that maximizes her status and gains is justified (disguised of course through the language of the cultural virtues of the time - individualism/"preferences" as Western freedom or Catholic virtue-LARPing). This is clearly evident from her contemptuously dismissing counter viewpoints of men on this board who are clearly far smarter and wise than her.

As such--even in a real patriarchy--she'd prob devise a way to secretly kill her Papuan husband and take his stuff. Then she'd book a one way ticket to find handsome. If this was like 1856, she'd just slut it up to the dumb, but well-meaning Papuan village chad

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5641336&forum_id=2#48391390)

i know precisely zero people who i attended schools (k-8, hs, ls - all catholic/jesuit) with that have any remaining connection to the church.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5641336&forum_id=2#48391608)

Wow.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5641336&forum_id=2#48405043)

if you want a primer that brings you out from Reddit-level atheism, go watch some Jay Dyer videos or something of that speed.

the more ridiculous thing here is her using religion as a skinsuit to taunt men's sexual preferences and to elevate her own status.

look at the way she sneers at a poaster above by saying that he's going to hell. if she was devoutly Catholic at all, she'd know that's not how it works and that such an attitude (even on xo) counts against her

what a nasty woman

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5641336&forum_id=2#48391616)

just trying to spread the truth here brother

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5641336&forum_id=2#48391643)

I think that pumo might be a FizzKid alt

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5641336&forum_id=2#48391795)

you asked why i think it's pathetic, and i did. even if your analysis about fizzkid was correct, that wouldn't change the fact that a bunch of dudes spending thanksgiving jerking each other off about it is pathetic.

and the irony that you often lament the state of modern women yet criticize fizzkid for embracing and actually acting in a way you say people should.

do you really think she is unaware that it would be easier to find a partner if she compromised on her religious values? especially considering that you create threads like this frequently to point it out?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5641336&forum_id=2#48392748)

you never said how i "grossly exaggerated" anything. im not irate at all.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5641336&forum_id=2#48392794)