Date: November 11th, 2026 12:57 PM Author: frank rizzo
can just say porn. all that shit should go. there's zero reason that every person should have millions of hours of this shit available at the click of a button on a device they carry with them at all times.
Date: November 11th, 2026 12:57 PM Author: Richard Ames
No joke, part of what helped me give up porn several years ago was the insane amount of "stepsister" and "family" porn that was being pumped out. Just a total "wtf is this shit" moment that sort of made me look at the bigger picture.
Date: November 11th, 2026 1:12 PM Author: Homemade Prostate
I got it but here’s my thing. Every guy has a fantasy, mine is being a lawyer and meeting a harem of 18-21 year old women, clearly and unmistakably adult and turning it into a porn company. That’s my fantasy. Banging them, watching them bang other guys etc.
Grok imagine allowed me to create this. I would sift through 1000’s of completely made up characters until I found 5 to live in my “BOP house.” No real sexual acts or nudity. It was like creating The OC with this premise. Then I realized my life got too involved in this when I was spending $100 a month on SuperGrok heavy so I quit.
But then it left a void. I don’t wanna fuck my wife. I don’t wanna get involved with real women and get a divorce and/or Russel Brand’d. So we’re left with nothing.
This stepfather bullshit never appealed to me. But to someone out there it’s holding his life as an “incel” or married man together. Now you’re talking that away, guys will find SOMETHING.
Date: November 11th, 2026 1:31 PM Author: a New York Times analysis of Reddit posts
lol at the free speech expert being named Jackman
“I would encourage both content creators and consumers to underscore the risks of this law,” says Myles Jackman, an obscenity lawyer in the UK. “Because to me, it genuinely seems like one of the greatest acts of suppression of free speech in global history.”
Date: November 11th, 2026 1:35 PM Author: Richard Ames
This actually makes me think that this is some weird backdoor approach to further censorship. A trojan horse of sorts.
Though it is also laughably insane how some lawyer will come out and call this an "attack on free speech," meanwhile the UK regularly arrests people for social media posts.
Date: November 11th, 2026 1:52 PM Author: Metaphysics is solved
The central controversy concerns the law's broad definition of suffocation. British obscenity lawyer Myles Jackman argues that the language could potentially encompass consensual sexual activities such as facesitting and oral sex, since these can involve temporarily obstructing someone's airway tp