See more of our coverage in your search results.

Add The New York Times as a preferred source on Google›

Russell Brand, the popular conspiracy-minded YouTuber who first found fame as a comedy and acting star, was found guilty on Thursday of one count of rape and three counts of sexual assault.

He was found not guilty of two other counts of rape and one count of attempted indecent assault.

The jury, at Southwark Crown Court in London, took about eight and a half hours to reach its unanimous decisions, which concerned episodes that prosecutors said involved six women and occurred between 1999 and 2009, a period when Mr. Brand was becoming a public figure.

As the jury’s foreman announced the verdicts, Mr. Brand, 51, stood impassively in a glass box reserved for defendants at the back of the courtroom. The judge, Joel Bennathan, said he would sentence Mr. Brand to “significant custodial time” on Monday and denied him bail.

Under British sentencing guidelines for rape, the maximum sentence is life imprisonment, although a more typical prison term is four to 19 years.

Mr. Brand could face further legal challenges related to his past sexual behavior. A spokeswoman for London’s police said in an emailed statement after the verdicts that officers had questioned Mr. Brand about two further accusations of rape and submitted files to prosecutors. He has also faced a civil action in the United States. Mr. Brand’s legal team did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Editors’ Picks

Tiny Love Stories: ‘Her 92-Year-Old Boyfriend’

My Adult Daughter Has Gone ‘No Contact’ With Me. What Should I Do?

What Causes Dandruff?

Image

Russell Brand and Laura Brand hold hands while walking on a street.

In the trial, only Mr. Brand’s wife, Laura, gave in-person evidence in his defense.Credit...Hannah Mckay/Reuters

The jury’s decisions came just over three years after The Times of London, The Sunday Times and the prominent British television program “Dispatches” published a joint investigation into Mr. Brand’s past behavior, in which four women accused the comedian of sexual assault, including one accusation of rape.

Those accusations prompted some of Mr. Brand’s supporters to rally around him, including Donald Trump Jr., and Elon Musk, who wrote on X: “I support Russell Brand. That man is not evil.” Conservative personalities like Tucker Carlson and Megyn Kelly and Charlie Kirk continued to express support after the police charged Mr. Brand.

Although the London trial did not include any of the women in the 2023 media investigation, some of the accusers in the trial told the court that they had come forward after seeing the coverage.

In October, Ian Winter, Mr. Brand’s lawyer, argued in a pretrial hearing that Mr. Brand could not receive a fair hearing because the news media had portrayed him as a rapist, and because the coverage had made “it impossible to persuade witnesses” to give evidence on Mr. Brand’s behalf. The judge dismissed that application, saying that a jury could be trusted to consider the accusations put before it.

In the trial, only Mr. Brand’s wife, Laura, gave in-person evidence in his defense.

During the trial, prosecutors called Mr. Brand a “ruthless” sexual predator who once considered women “simply a means to an end.” Then the jury heard testimony from the six women who said that Mr. Brand had assaulted or raped them, sometimes only moments after they had met him.

Image

Russell Brand, shirtless and wearing white pants and a belt, raises an upturned hand toward the camera.

Mr. Brand in a London Metropolitan Police handout photo, from 1999, that was taken by one of the complainants and shown during his trial.Credit...Metropolitan Police

In Britain, anyone who makes sexual assault accusations is granted lifelong anonymity outside the courtroom regardless of a jury’s verdict.

In the trial, Mr. Brand mostly gave short answers when testifying. He told the jury that he had “misused” his fame to obtain sex but had always obtained consent, which he said was “fundamental, essential, necessary.”

Today, Mr. Brand is best known as a YouTuber — his channel has over 6.6 million subscribers — and he also posts clips to his 10 million followers on X. But in the early 2000s he was one of Britain’s most popular comedians, and a regular television and radio presenter, known for a distinctive look of wild hair and tight jeans.

The charges in the trial covered a period from 1999, when Brand was an aspiring comedian, to August 2009, just months after he performed his comedy show “Scandalous” to an audience of 16,000 in London.

During the period, Mr. Brand also started becoming better known outside Britain. A starring role in the 2008 movie “Forgetting Sarah Marshall” brought him recognition in the United States, and he hosted the MTV Video Music Awards that year and in 2009.

Image

Russell Brand speaks into a microphone while standing on a stage in front of a cheering crowd.

Mr. Brand hosting the MTV Video Music Awards in New York in 2009.Credit...Christopher Polk/Getty Images

In the early 2000s, Britain’s tabloid newspapers, and many comedy audiences, celebrated Mr. Brand’s promiscuity and lewd humor. The Sun, a popular tabloid, named Mr. Brand “shagger of the year” several times because of the amount of sex he was having.

In more recent years, Mr. Brand has become better known for his conspiracy-minded YouTube videos aimed at an American audience, sometimes featuring interviews with prominent conservative politicians and commentators. In recent months, those videos have also focused on Mr. Brand’s Christian faith, including with the comedian and his wife posting weekly “Sunday Service” clips.

Alex Marshall is a Times reporter

(https://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5919048&forum_id=2#50234285)

Complainant 1 alleged that she was raped by Russell Brand after meeting him on the fringes of the Labour Party Conference in 1999. C1 invited Brand back to her hotel room and alleged that he pushed her onto the bed and raped her. Brand, who was not famous in 1999, argued that the encounter was consensual.

Verdict: Not guilty

Charge 2, Complainant 2: Attempted Indecent Assault

Complainant 2, a former MTV employee, accused Brand of attempting to pull her into a toilet at the network’s London offices in 2001. During the trial, judge Mr Justice Bennathan reduced the charge from indecent assault to attempted indecent assault because there was “insufficient evidence” to support the original count. Brand’s defense was that he did not recall the incident, but denied that he attempted any non-consensual assault.

Verdict: Not guilty

Charge 3, Complainant 3: Sexual Assault

Complainant 3 alleged that Brand “lunged and squeezed” her breasts within minutes of their first meeting in 2004 while attending the birthday party of a TV producer at London’s Nordic Bar. Brand denied sexually assaulting Complainant 3, who worked at MTV at the time.

Verdict: Guilty

Charge 4, Complainant 3: Rape

Complainant 3 alleged that Brand grabbed her arm and dragged her into the toilets of the Nordic Bar. The woman claimed that Brand climbed onto the toilet seat, exposed himself, forced his penis in her mouth, and ejaculated. In his defense, Brand argued that Complainant 3 willingly accompanied him to the toilet, where they had a “kiss and a cuddle.” He denied orally raping the woman.

Verdict: Not guilty

ADVERTISEMENT

Charge 5, Complainant 4: Sexual Assault

Complainant 4 alleged that she was sexually assaulted by Brand at a radio station in 2004 or 2005. She claimed that Brand “grabbed” her, pushed her up against a wall, and kissed her “sloppily and aggressively.” Brand denied the incident.

Verdict: Guilty

Charge 6, Complainant 5: Rape

Complainant 5 alleged that she was anally raped by Brand at his London home in 2009 days after meeting him backstage at his stand-up show, where she gave him consensual oral sex. Complainant 5 said they had consensual vaginal sex at his home,efore alleging that Brand turned her on all fours and unexpectedly penetrated her anally, removing his condom. Brand said the anal intercourse was consensual.

Verdict: Guilty

(https://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5919048&forum_id=2#50234299)