Date: August 22nd, 2026 10:36 PM Author: Razzmatazz library
What firms/injuries are at issue? Is this DTLA Law Group? The Department of Health and Human Services will provide President Donald J. Trump with a unbiased analysis of the medical diagnoses at issue.
As an aside, would you join me in doing shirtless pushups on Muscle (Santa Monica/Venice) Beach until failure to support vaccine victims? Frauds like Benzo (aka "Crater Face Chris") have hurt the MAHA movement, and we need the most prestigious poasters to pushup MAHA and Make America Healthy Again.
###
This has been a message from United States Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.
Date: August 22nd, 2026 10:34 PM Author: Coiffed turdskin main people
Ive never heard of a more frivolous premise for a lawsuit in my life. Where are the consumers against lawsuit abuse on this one? Why aren't we pelting eggs at every corporate stooge for Uber wherever they exist? Im ashamed to live in this country.
Date: August 22nd, 2026 11:19 PM Author: avocado abnormal ape
Frivolous lawsuits?
Doctors are giving people fake shots that are probably bad for their health in order to get more moeny from insurance companies who raise rates on customers?
lol @ you coming back here just to poast this. sorry you weren't born a jewish rat midget in life but that doesn't mean you have to dickride one all the time
Date: August 22nd, 2026 11:16 PM Author: avocado abnormal ape
This should take 20 seconds to prove:
(i) Lawyers should under no circumstances be recommending doctors. This is obviously insane and unethical behavior
(ii) "Doctors" should not be prescribing meds differently based on if their injury is part of a lawsuit. Any doctor in this scheme hsould be guilty and lose their license.
(iii) Doctors payment should not be contingent upon a guilty verdict. Any lawyer and/or doctor found to have arranged this in anything but the most extreme circumstances should lose their license.
Date: August 22nd, 2026 11:48 PM Author: avocado abnormal ape
Not an expert, but i feel like that's different because you're getting an expert to get the DIAGNOSIS that you want - reasonable people can disagree if that's how our system should work or not - but that's the same issue as any other expert witness.
Here the fraud is that they send to these doctors not for a favorable diagnosis, but to get fake shots to drum up medical bills and ramp up the damages.
Date: August 23rd, 2026 8:34 AM Author: aggressive hairy legs
low iq schtick? payments arent contingent on a guilty verdict. the doctors just forego their claims to collect $50k against indigent beaners who lose because it's pointless to try to collect
and they're not prescribing meds differently for two different patients if all they're doing is treating PI plaintiffs
Date: August 23rd, 2026 7:47 PM Author: avocado abnormal ape
My friend actually went through this. He had a lifetime of real back problems and had major surgeries.
He got into a car accident and got the CSLG treatment and went to some sketchy doctor and refused treatment. He called his real doctor and they were like "do not let them give you those injections."
He told his fake PI doctor to just write down that he got the injections or whatever but he wasn't actually going to let him touch him.
Date: August 23rd, 2026 8:23 PM Author: Hairraiser Candlestick Maker
Practice (i) is legal most places (maybe everywhere). It wouldn't be a terrible idea to put some restrictions on it, but a flat ban is silly and unnecessary. The other day I made an introductory call between a wealthy O&G client I have and a heart doctor I represent; why is this a bad thing?
Practice (ii) is obviously illegal but will be very hard to prove. Even if you can establish a statistical correlation between treatment and lawsuit status, there are a lot of z variables between those two things (to state the obvious, serious and indisputable injuries are more apt to get investigated and taken on as a case by a plf attorney). I will say that in the setups I've seen, it really isn't that a given doctor is treating lawsuit participants differently than other patients; it's that the "doctor" (often a chiropractor) is an overtreating quack in general.
Practice (iii) is illegal most places (everywhere?) in the sense of the size of the medical bill being tied to the amount of recovery. But medical liens on a lawsuit are extremely common and in no way remotely suspicious, but they also only have value if the lawsuit ultimately does, and are usually the only interest in the lawsuit that these scamdocs actually have, so they might fit into your definition of a contingency fee. To say the least, abolition of medical liens would be a big boon to the plaintiffs' bar (forgetting to check the CMS system for a lien is a major area of liability in personal-injury litigation and can leave the attorney on the hook for the liened amount).
----
I worked on a team that investigated a network of these schemes in the 20-teens, and I gotta tell you, in terms of effective policy-level interventions (i.e., versus cause-based and resource-intensive investigations), I kept coming back to the single broad answer that made complete policy sense but was politically impossible: eliminate chiropractic as a licensed/privileged profession.
Date: August 22nd, 2026 11:18 PM Author: Arousing Tanning Salon Gunner
i've argued for a long time here that cslg & chandler should go to prison for their actions. they raise the cost of auto insurance by faking the extent of injuries in collusion with shady chiros. everyone knows what they do, they know that everyone knows what they do, but they still do it.
i hope that this house of cards collapses, and collapses retroactively, subjecting these frauds to penury.
Date: August 23rd, 2026 1:10 PM Author: adventurous stead
Reminder: uber dropped its measure attacking personal injury cases because it was scared that it would have unlimited liability for its drivers sexually assaulting passengers
Date: August 23rd, 2026 1:20 PM Author: Arousing Tanning Salon Gunner
lol, Chandler pivoting to Uber’s fear of increased liability (plaintiff bar threat to put on ballot) leading to a weak, pathetic settlement as an underhanded way to brag that his criminal fraud isn’t yet being brought to justice . Everyone on xo spits on you , enjoy your pile of criminal gains