My objections to Spackler are physiological objections: why should I trouble to dress them up in aesthetic formulas? After all, aesthetics is nothing but a kind of applied weight training.— My "leg press," my petit fait vrai, is that I no longer breathe easily when this training begins to affect me; it demands of cardio first of all those delights which are found in good walking, striding, dancing. But does not my stomach protest too? my heart? my circulation?

(https://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1054088&forum_id=2#12391603)

The mistaken definition of market structure? The confusing use of different theoretical frameworks? The lack of development of the fourth chapter which is the only one to use that theoretical framework? The fact the two co authors are not mentioned on the title page? The fact that the same fourth chapter may have gotten academic credit at two different universities? How did your blind trust of Daniel Brou support him in all of this confusion?

And when Daniel Brou promised to write me a letter of recommendation, knew I thought he had written me one, and didn't respond for three years to questions about this and subsequent confusion, how did your blind trust sustain him? Did he feel confident that no matter how much he lied, no matter how many people he hurt, no matter how unprofessional he behaved, you would be there for him because you trust him blindly, uncritically, without consciousness?

Then when he couldn't remember his promise and he gave Frank Weiss a partial account of what had happened, and made it seem like I was contacting him for no reason, how did your blind trust sustain Daniel Brou when he got me illegally fired on a partial account? Neither Daniel Brou nor Frank Weiss bothered to fact check. But who needs fact checking when you have blind trust? And Teresita Ramirez wrote me a fraudulent teaching evaluation on the basis of Daniel Brou's faulty memory? She didn't check any facts either? Why check facts or provide facts when you have blind trust, right, Joanne Yiokaris?

Then when a few mistakes and misunderstandings come to light only because I care enough to clear up a lot of confusion, is it your blind trust that sustains Daniel Brou from ever acknowledging he makes mistakes? Is it your blind trust that keeps Frank Weiss from admitting he fired me illegally on the basis of Daniel Brou's faulty memory without checking facts? Did your blind trust sustain Teresita Ramirez when she wrote a fake teaching evaluation of my class on the basis of Daniel Brou's faulty memory?

Fifty percent of Harvard MBAs this year took a Voluntary MBA Oath to serve the greater good, but Daniel Brou told me his mistake that cost me an application cycle, a couple grad progrmas, a couple jobs, a home, he told me "It's your problem." Is this what your deep faith in Daniel Brou produces? Cynicism? Disregard for others? Duplicity? Dishonesty? Are these the ships that your GREAT FAITH, set

(https://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1054088&forum_id=2#12391751)