It's obvious, on one hand, that being a failure with women is not prestigious, because failing at anything is unprestigious. This much should be self-evident. Yet, because many women are such TTTs in terms of their dating choices, their tastes in men being outright low-class and trashy, being successful with women is also not prestigious, because success in this department means that a man adheres to a low-class, loser-fucker metric of human worth that is incompatible with elite values. Either way, the man is entirely unprestigious.

There are, of course, women whose tastes in men are not TTT. Prestigious women do exist, but are rare. (For the purposes of this discussion, we'll consider a woman prestigious if her tastes in men are respectable.) My presumption is that would be most prestigious to find such women, then date and marry only them. The problem is that prestigious women are scattered sporadically about society, and difficult to find. There just aren't enough of them for them to make any measurable difference. I find it very hard myself to find prestigious women when I am looking for them; then again, maybe I'm just not prestigious enough.

However, noting that prestigious women are rare, it's inconceivable that their sparse existence modifies, in any way, the answer to the question at hand: is it better to be attractive to women, or repulsive to them? Of course, the answer is still that neither is acceptable. Both possibilities, as proven above, are TTT.

The only solution to this unprestigious and otherwise intractible Catch-22 is as follows: the women with TTT tastes in men must be subjected to mandatory, government-run re-education programs. Nothing less than 1950s-style brainwashing (without the torture) must be used. Only this will bring us a world where it is possible and safe for a man to be prestigious.

Reporting for civic duty,

-pensive

(https://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=279655&forum_id=2#4058162)

2. Confidence and risk-seeking-- which I agree are not low-class traits-- are not enough to pwn women.

(https://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=279655&forum_id=2#4058208)

no wonder I like your stuff

(https://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=279655&forum_id=2#4058398)

which one does the liberal, rational math major who's into gaming and never had a relationship before sound like to you?

(https://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=279655&forum_id=2#4060536)

here's a hint: if she doesn't even dump her actual boyfriend, she probably doesn't intend it to be long-term. (the fact that the experience in question is 6 days long is another strike against this counting as a "relationship." you admitted as much on another thread.)

(https://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=279655&forum_id=2#4061994)

How does he know what she "intended" it to be. Ridiculous.

(https://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=279655&forum_id=2#4062469)

Even in that off chance that you're in the area, I'd have to get to know you first. I can't see myself sleeping with a random stranger.

(https://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=279655&forum_id=2#4058346)

I had to order special elastic underpants off the Internet.

(https://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=279655&forum_id=2#4058427)

I say this every damn pensive thread, but here I go again: Pensive you have a really weird idea of what prestigious means. It is rooted in other people wanting to be like you. You can't just declare yourself prestigious, and doing weird shit is almost categorically unprestigious.

(https://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=279655&forum_id=2#4059003)

http://www.goddesspost.com/largeimage/largeimage.asp?imageurl=large/current/20051015(19_20_15).jpg

he hears it over and over again, but just doesn't get it.

(https://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=279655&forum_id=2#4060559)

More generally, how's being a loser-fucker going for you?

(https://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=279655&forum_id=2#4060636)

Hey, I think your lunch break's over. You should get back to your register, the customers are getting anxious.

(https://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=279655&forum_id=2#4060673)

and perhaps most importantly, i don't whine on the internet about how women don't like me and it's "all their fault."

(https://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=279655&forum_id=2#4062139)

These two facts are enough to exclude the possibility of you having a "nice job"; while it's possible that you make a good income, as some kind of six-figure hazmat-cleaner, I guarantee that you're not in a position of responsibility or influence because you're simply not smart enough to handle one. Your claims about your relationship competence are likewise dubious, though perhaps not refuted by your evident stupidity. Finally, given the energy you've out into harassing me, who you've never met, on an Internet message board, I can safely conclude that you're entirely delusional about your "well-liked" status; if your social life were as great as you claim it to be, you'd have no need for this activity.

(https://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=279655&forum_id=2#4063474)

* I'm not a fan of ending sentences with prepositions; it just isn't my thing.

(https://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=279655&forum_id=2#4068155)