Date: October 24th, 2005 11:56 AM Author: godawful jew
It is interesting how unadulterated Stroock-bashing is so highly appreciated on this board and yet something like the original post was not well-received. That said, I'm willing to repost if there is sufficient demand for those of you who are curious to read the so-called monstrosity I had drafted.
Date: October 24th, 2005 12:14 AM Author: Galvanic massive casino
I love it, it's the perfect free market at work. Had he done well we would have given him 180s. Instead he was bitchslapped . This is just the XOXO market removing an inefficiency.
Date: October 24th, 2005 12:38 PM Author: godawful jew
"looking for a grade ?" Please do enlighten me as to when a particular comment is "looking for a grade" and how your reply is responsive to my prior post.
Date: October 24th, 2005 12:41 PM Author: magenta marketing idea rehab
I wasn't trying to be funny or clever. I said FUCK YOU. That is all. Such a comment is not worthy of being graded one way or another and is not intended to be read as such. Your OP was obviously meant to be funny in some way or another and just as obviously was pathetic, retarded, and painfully unfunny. You posted it looking for a "grade" and you know it. It isn't my fault that the grade you got was a failing one. So fuck off.
Date: October 24th, 2005 12:52 PM Author: godawful jew
I wasn't grading the wording of your comment per se but rather its effectiveness given the context. I'm not sure why you think that you have the monopoly on deciding which comment is "worthy of being graded" and which comment is not. Moreover, I don't know why, without having seen my original post, you infer that the post was pathetic, etc. merely from a few negative comments (a staple on this board) and my decision to delete it (which, for all you know, has nothing to do with the fact that the original post was not appreciated). Finally, just for the record, I was not looking for a grade but for comments. Is there anything else you wish to add to this admittedly pathetic quibble ?
Date: October 24th, 2005 1:02 PM Author: magenta marketing idea rehab
I don't think I have a monopoly, but you're just being a cockdunce if you don't realize that there are some posts that are intended to be graded and others that aren't.
Date: October 24th, 2005 1:14 PM Author: godawful jew
Thank you, zoomtard; I just wanted to demonstrate that it is possible to conduct a squabble on XOXO without name-calling and other uncivilized behavior. And, of course, amuse you all in the process.
Date: October 24th, 2005 1:08 PM Author: fragrant swollen theater queen of the night
This may be the most complete pwnage in the history of this board. The OP is now fighting with someone about whose comment was worse.
For what it's worth, the original letter was something similar to this:
Dear Stroock,
I regret to inform you that I will be dinging your firm and will not be spending my summer at your TTT in your penguin group. I must admit that your firm's emphasis on bowling was a deciding factor. My credentials indicate that our paths will likely never cross again during my career, and I sincerely hope this is the case.
Seriously, this is almost a direct quote. I think he mentioned bowling too. It was truly awful.
Date: October 24th, 2005 1:40 PM Author: fragrant swollen theater queen of the night
It indicates that you thought your work was so brilliant that it would be needed at some later date. Maybe you were planning on e-mailing it to your friends. Maybe you wanted to post it at your law school or tell people about it at parties.
The point is this: you did more to PWN yourself in three minutes than most people ever do and you saved the evidence because you thought it was hilarious.
Date: October 24th, 2005 1:45 PM Author: godawful jew
It indicates no such thing. I save everything. That's what people in the legal profession do, in case you didn't know. Your inferences are woefully inadequate and completely incorrect.
I'm also looking for a XOXO dictionary definition for PWN-related neologisms. Anyone here care to provide it ?
Date: October 24th, 2005 1:47 PM Author: magenta marketing idea rehab
You might save everything, but you don't really need to save this thread. You'll see it again when God shows it to you as evidence for why he's rejecting you from heaven. And again when the Devil uses it to explain why he doesn't want you in hell.
Date: October 24th, 2005 1:33 PM Author: Zombie-like trump supporter
the OP is being a pussy and then has the fucking gall to defend himself by telling people they have not been true to the spirit of his post which is too shameful to see the light of the day.
Date: October 24th, 2005 1:48 PM Author: magenta marketing idea rehab
Generally the "show me a... and I'll show you a..." is used in a different manner. The way your post is constructed it makes it sound like all XO posters have supreme self-confidence, which is wrong, many don't.
Date: October 24th, 2005 1:51 PM Author: godawful jew
Chutzpah is not having a supreme self-confidence but rather acting like you do. While I think it's pretty clear that many people here don't have it, it is also clear that most act like they do.