Date: November 15th, 2005 11:04 PM Author: abusive location french chef
Ah, but 3 is the crux of the analysis! You must inform us of what motivates you. Is it mere apathy? You strike me as a sluggish beast, a brutish brontosaurus, lumbering between McDonald's and Oprah. True?
Date: November 15th, 2005 11:08 PM Author: Brilliant Thriller University Goyim
My powerscore instructor, who also scored a 174, used the word crux a lot. Interesting, he seemed quietly cocky though, which is opposite of your schtick
because people are just interested in knowing things, you stupid cunt. there isn't some dark malady behind every question and every comment that has some negative aspect.
she is; she would be a sub-standard presence at the typical american high school. but at the same time it would be a loss if she were to leave. there is an odd comfort in having someone around who is almost always wrong and/or obvious and hackneyed in the extreme, especially if you work or go to school with people who almost never are. it's not just anyone you can reliably get to say things like "money doesn't buy happiness" and "it's the inside of a person, not what's on the outside that counts." unlike other valuable posters, however, there's nothing honest or revealing about her. she is basically a propaganda machine, stating and restating her difficult quest for mediocrity. and she conducts herself by the politician's guiding maxim: respond to every attack. the responses are tiresome and redundant, though. overall, she provides an implicit checklist of things you wouldn't want to be or become.
against all odds, she is going to do well on the LSAT, even better in law school, and thereafter "improve the lives of others," which will allow her to continue claiming to be better than others under the guise of humility. (she's also never been fucked. but of course lack of desirability is no part of that. it is every bit a choice, apparently commanded and approved of by god himself.)
Date: November 15th, 2005 11:29 PM Author: Boyish Field
Bitter, bitter Renada.... Yes, I will do well on the LSAT, in ls, and thereafter.... Also, I am a Virgin because of my moral, religious, and personal beliefs....
"I will not reveal the name of the school that I attend, becaue that is personal information. i chose the school that was best according to my interests and personal preferences, not the one that some rankings told be to go to. You know, 174/Renada, it is really sad that you can not think for yourself and make decisions based upon your own principles and interests. Why are you so bitter? You must not have gotteninto any of the schools you really wanted to go to. Sad."
she can tell this one is a trick question. i'd recommend a quick reprise of the reliable "bitter" retort, followed by something containing the phrase "plaing the race card," and then one of those steel-willed departures ("bye. i do not wish to waste my tme with people like your self.") possibly a "you post here because you have no friends," too.
Date: November 15th, 2005 11:33 PM Author: excitant copper chapel
My predictions:
You won't do well on the LSAT, but will nevertheless get into a law school you don't deserve to get into.
Supposedly, when a guy is a virgin, it's because he's a loser. When a girl is a virgin, it's because of her morals. Somehow I think you are just ugly, which has been implied above.
Date: November 16th, 2005 12:43 AM Author: abusive location french chef
Did you honestly not understand that? There are pigs that can manipulate buttons and gorillas that can paint, yet you prove incapable of detecting obvious implications. Amazing.
i would stake all my internal organs on her not breaking 160. in fact, i will gargle the cum of a homeless man in federal court if she does. i will also slice my cock like pepperoni, and smuggle it onto the pope's pizza if she breaks 160.
Date: November 16th, 2005 12:13 AM Author: Milky fragrant alpha cuckold
she responds to everything.
(imagine the confusion as her tiny mind considers whether there is a way to not respond to that, thereby disproving it, but to also post in such a way as to claim credit for not responding. hint: there's a way to do it, but you'll never figure it out. so it's best to fall back into you comfort zone. may i suggest "Why are you so bitter?" or perhaps something with a broader sweep: "I respond if i want to, and di not care what you think..." And don't forget, "Hi 174...")
Date: November 16th, 2005 12:17 AM Author: abusive location french chef
"Hi 174" is a classic move. Once I responded to her with a "Hi 174!" She nearly suffered an aneurysm in vehemently asserting that she was not in fact me.
Date: November 16th, 2005 12:54 AM Author: abusive location french chef
This is a new strategy, I'm eager to see where you go with it. It reminds me of when John Carpenter shockingly got rid of Jason in Halloween 3 after the first two movies established an expected theme.
Date: November 15th, 2005 11:48 PM Author: Snowy Vivacious Meetinghouse
In her defense, she doesn't say anything on here that deserves anywhere near the level of harrassment she receives. Her posts are usually in the form of "not all Blacks are dumb animals" or "to be a Virgin is a good thing, and I am one." There is nothing apparently bad about these statements. (Their level of annoyance is debatable and perhaps relative depending on the circums., however.) She is prone to extreme harrassment, perhaps more than anyone else, because she is indeed of a good-natured temperament, and she finds some satisfaction in responding to all of her attackers. This makes her many battles personal. In other words, while most other controversial posters here typically do not respond to *every* attacker and rarely post on attack threads bearing their names (Rowan, for example, rarely posts on new "Rowan is ugly" threads), she feels it her duty to respond to every racist accusation or mischaracterization of her various maxims. This is where I find her greatest fault, although it is by no means of the magnitude complained of by posters such as 174 and the "are you black? what are your monikers" cadre. Those that dislike her do so for no other reason than that she is unwilling to compromise her views in order to satisfy perceptions and accusations of other posters; she is consistently s "self-righteous Black woman/activist"; and people here, predictably, hate that. Her views on race, although at times slightly racist depending on the reader, aren't as "stupid" as people might suggest. Nothing she says here hasn't been said over and over again by every talking-head discussing the matter for the past 20 or so years. This is why I find widespread contempt for her views so odd. They are not novel, or even extreme. In a sense, they are boring and trite. Posts like that deserve to be ignored, I think.
Date: November 16th, 2005 12:10 AM Author: Boyish Field
What is your problem? Why do you harbor hostility towards me? I have not really responded to your posts prior to this thread, unless you posted/post under another moniker that I am unaware of....
Date: November 16th, 2005 12:22 AM Author: abusive location french chef
I, however, am a genius. You should take notes on my posts, just like the children of the village hung onto every word Socrates uttered. You are probably older than me but are childlike in terms of mental ability. I am the paragon of success, brilliance and power. Harriet Tubman told me this.
Date: December 14th, 2005 1:08 PM Author: jet-lagged patrolman
Date: December 14th, 2005 3:42 AM
Author: &# (Their entire house is darksided too!... Gargoyles!... Psychics! )
I could not tell you that.... However, I can tell you what it is like to go through life with an IQ of 120+.... That should answer the remainder of your questions....
Date: November 15th, 2005 11:56 PM Author: Exhilarant Tripping School Partner
No, it was funny weeks ago when we were all going around saying "are you black what are your previous monikers". Then it was funny. Now it is retarted. You barely even post here wtf
Date: November 16th, 2005 12:00 AM Author: well-lubricated bat-shit-crazy trailer park ceo
suck my dick, your lack of humor is all over and is not limited to this joke alone. your boring posts on the CB are evidence of this fact. i post quite regularly on the CB.
im sure not posting here is equivalent to not reading this area as well, you idiot, how is not posting on this side have anything to do with it at all
Date: November 16th, 2005 12:04 AM Author: Exhilarant Tripping School Partner
Yes, I bow before you, ill kid.
Please, continue to be the "future" of XOXO and enlighten us with your awe-inspiring wisdom. Your posts on the collegeboard are first-rate. No doubt about it.
i continue to be amazed that there's a cable channel that just shows people fishing. yet it's easily avoided. and perhaps you missed where she claimed to be a "glutton for verbal abuse."
we are on the verge of contempt transforming into an erotic conflagration. so unless you have a different take on what a dumb and worthless piece of shit she is, perhaps you'd be more comfortable on a thread that debates whether texas is "national." your heroism is duly noted, however.
Date: November 16th, 2005 12:15 AM Author: Bright Yarmulke Lodge
Way to figure out how to copy and paste text. Congratulations. Your parents must be so proud of you when they're not flinging their refuse at each other.
Date: November 16th, 2005 12:28 AM Author: Milky fragrant alpha cuckold
you can go now; you aren't even stupid in an interesting way.
how are you coming finding those "maxims" and "racist misinterpretations." obviously you had something specific in mind, and it's just a matter of finding it.
Date: November 16th, 2005 12:09 AM Author: abusive location french chef
What are you talking about? Do you not understand the meaning of the intenet slang "pwn3d"? The fact that you think renada was "clearly" pwned is further evidence of your low LSAT score and general ineptitude.
Date: November 16th, 2005 9:56 AM Author: abusive location french chef
Among Joe Caltech's many accomplishments, I find the most prestigious to be his staring role as mentally-disabled "Corky" in "Life Goes On." http://www.mcmorran.com/eventgallery/burke.jpg
Date: November 16th, 2005 10:08 AM Author: Milky fragrant alpha cuckold
he's not a bad guy. but he posts like he's conducting a press conference at a nuclear arms containment summit. plus, last night he quite deliberately put the word libel in the thread title, and then renounced it as superfluous. everything is designed to have deniability, so he can respond in what he regards as a still-dominant position. i miss the days when rhodes scholars were great athletes with 4.0s, rather than extreme controlling personalities with some extracurricular thing that was in the newspaper. apart from clinton, they have really underachieved as a group. all of them that i've ever known basically sit around waiting to be revered. and they've lacked all spontaneity, choosing their words as if history is listening. it reminds me of john rawls, who taught his class by just reading from the manuscirpt of his next book, so as not to be on record as having said anything that was not thoroughly considered in all its implications. but, of course, they aren't john rawls yet. apart from holding an advantage in initial, very competitive things -- getting into good graduate schools, getting a first book deak, etc. -- it doesn't seem to be something that stretches over a lifetime quite the way it once did. and if run-of-the-mill people at harvard are as deluded and arrogant as they are about sizing up their sparkling destiny and practicing the gestures of false modesty, spending a year with 32 of those assclowns must be intolerable.
it's woeful when Poetic Dreamer is the best you can do for a lackey. but it was worth being there to see how deeply he cared about preserving his ability to say that he both consorts with, and has come to the defense of, a genuine rhodes.