Starting with the Mexicans because they're BY FAR the largest block and the biggest problem.

Blacks can stay if they want cause we brought them here.

(https://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4318709&forum_id=2#38654037)

Asians, no, unless they're on a tech / science / medicine visa and are sterilized.

(https://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4318709&forum_id=2#38654048)

No more lawyers

(https://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4318709&forum_id=2#38654756)

But controversial on XO? Maybe that being a step dad would be cool

(https://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4318709&forum_id=2#38653940)

existence is essentially undesirable and the sooner mankind has an honest confrontation with mortality the sooner we can attain deliverance.

(https://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4318709&forum_id=2#38653943)

—

Voice: "All life bears death from birth. Life fears death, but lives

only to die. It starts with anxiety. Anxiety becomes fear. Fear

leads to anger...anger leads to hate...hate leads to suffering...

The only cure for this fear is total destruction. Kuja was a

victim of his own fear. He concluded he could only save himself

by destroying the origin of all things--the crystal."

Zidane: "What the heck are you talking about? Why are you telling me

all this?"

Voice: "...Now, the theory is undeniable. Kuja's actions prove it. All

things live to perish. At last, life has uncovered this truth.

Now, it is time to end this world."

Zidane: "Wh-What do you mean by that?"

Voice: "I exist for one purpose... To return everything back to the

zero world, where there is no life and no crystal to give life.

In a world of nothing, fear does not exist. This is the world

that all life desires."

(https://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4318709&forum_id=2#38664993)

(https://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4318709&forum_id=2#38654013)

(https://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4318709&forum_id=2#38654039)

I also think birthright citizenship should be revoked

(https://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4318709&forum_id=2#38654041)

No idea who that is.

(https://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4318709&forum_id=2#38654201)

I read some job descriptions over in AU and none have the sjw disclaimers like they have here in the states. Seemed quaint.

(https://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4318709&forum_id=2#38654377)

I dont trust the government - or parents.

(https://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4318709&forum_id=2#38654194)

I'm not really fond of large chunks of my own upbringing, so I'm sympathetic. But I'm having a hard time envisioning how reforms could realistically work out

As it is, we're kind of going the wrong way on a lot of this stuff. Expecting kids to be on their parent's insurance until their mid-20s, raising the age of consent, making lifelong sex offenders out of teens caught up in sexting with peers, etc.

(https://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4318709&forum_id=2#38654256)

And then these overprotected children grow up to be authoritarian little shitheads, shouting with spittle flying just DEMANDING that the government protect them and take away their rights. They don't know what freedom is anymore, it makes them uncomfortable.

(https://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4318709&forum_id=2#38654658)

Looking forward to you pulling a TMF and doing a complete 180 in 5 yrs after you’ve had a kid for a few years. Not to say I don’t agree with you

(https://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4318709&forum_id=2#38654832)

more people are coming around to this.

(https://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4318709&forum_id=2#38658128)

- flying sucks and taking a bus or train is preferrable for any non-cross country trip

- “singularity” is bullshit and tech progress has largely stalled since the 50s

- China and their economic system doesn’t get enough credit for lifting a billion ppl out of poverty. It’s one of humanity’s greatest achievements

- most chain food restaurants are pretty good

- weed should be illegal

- black ppl aren’t all that bad and whites need to ally with them against the Mexicans and Asians

(https://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4318709&forum_id=2#38654774)

the idea of "retribution" when it comes to disciplining rule-breakers is completely incoherent. "punishments" like "life sentences" make zero sense. if someone was really such a threat to society that they needed to be imprisoned for life (or for "25 years"), they should just be expelled or killed

(https://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4318709&forum_id=2#38654831)

the morality of the consequences of actions and the moral nature of individual human beings are two separate things. we don't imprison, expel, or kill the cold-blooded murderer because he "committed a cold-blooded murder." we act against him because he is the kind of human being who will murder again, and we don't want people to be murdered in our society, so we want to prevent him from doing so

we choose not to imprison, expel, or kill the woman who killed someone while texting and driving because she is not the kind of person who will likely kill someone again (unless she exhibits a pattern of this sort of anti-social inconsiderate behavior). there are of course many people (even within our own "legal system!") who want to "punish" people who break rules as a sort of "retribution," and would want to imprison this woman because of some vague incoherent emotional feeling that she "deserves it"

people have a really hard time grasping the distinction between the morality of actions in and of themselves, and the morality of humans as moral agents. in my experience people get more upset at me when i explain this distinction more than any of the other random "controversial" opinions that i have

(https://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4318709&forum_id=2#38654917)

"correct, there's no moral difference between those acts as you describe them. or between those acts and killing someone with your car because you were texting and driving"

when people say there's a moral difference between the acts, they mean there's a moral difference between choosing to deliberately murder someone and choosing to drive in a somewhat inattentive way. they're referring to the human agent involved. i don't know what you mean by "the morality of actions in and of themselves."

i might just be agreeing with you here, but i think you're doing a very poor job of expounding on a statement of "there's no moral difference between "manslaughter" and murder. consequences are the only thing that determines the moral evaluation"

(https://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4318709&forum_id=2#38654999)