https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/20-1199_hgdj.pdf

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5364936&forum_id=2#46487478)

Second, respondents’ admissions programs fail to articulate a meaningful connection between the means they employ and the goals they

pursue. To achieve the educational benefits of diversity, respondents

measure the racial composition of their classes using racial categories

that are plainly overbroad (expressing, for example, no concern

whether South Asian or East Asian students are adequately represented as “Asian”);

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5364936&forum_id=2#46487530)

many ways. Some of them are plainly overbroad: by grouping together all Asian students, for instance, respondents

are apparently uninterested in whether South Asian or

East Asian students are adequately represented, so long as

there is enough of one to compensate for a lack of the other.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5364936&forum_id=2#46487540)

Take the “Asian” category. It sweeps into one pile East

Asians (e.g., Chinese, Korean, Japanese) and South Asians

(e.g., Indian, Pakistani, Bangladeshi), even though together

they constitute about 60% of the world’s population. Bernstein Amicus Brief 2, 5. This agglomeration of so many peoples paves over countless differences in “language,” “culture,” and historical experience. Id., at 5–6. It does so even

though few would suggest that all such persons share “similar backgrounds and similar ideas and experiences.”

Fisher v. University of Tex. at Austin, 579 U. S. 365, 414

(2016) (ALITO, J., dissenting). Consider, as well, the development of a separate category for “Native Hawaiian or

Other Pacific Islander.” It seems federal officials disaggregated these groups from the “Asian” category only in the

1990s and only “in response to political lobbying.” Bernstein Amicus Brief 9–10. And even that category contains

its curiosities. It appears, for example, that Filipino Americans remain classified as “Asian” rather than “Other Pacific Islander.” See 4 App. in No. 21–707, at 1732.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5364936&forum_id=2#46487551)

N. Y. Times, Dec. 3, 2022, p. A18, col. 1 (“[T]he rumor that students can

appear ‘too Asian’ has hardened into a kind of received wisdom within

many Asian American communities,” and “college admissions consultants [have] spoke[n] about trying to steer their Asian American clients

away from so-called typically Asian activities such as Chinese language

school, piano and Indian classical instruments.”).

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5364936&forum_id=2#46487573)

*bans affirmative action that will continue unabated*

*does the same with abortion*

*nominates a guy who will have been found guilty of 70 felonies *

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5364936&forum_id=2#46487541)

2. This IS the GOP winning elections. The supreme court is majority conservative because of the "felon" you mention.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5364936&forum_id=2#46487753)

what do you suppose the purpose of politics is? to hold power to to effectuate policy? this is why pelosi gets elected speaker but won't even put medicare for all on the floor even though like 90% of democratic voters support it. because you just want power for powers sake.

lol just lol at celebrating gop accomplishing their policy goals as some sort of win for your side. this is the mind of libs. even when they're losing, they're winning.

lol @ you. this is a great day!

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5364936&forum_id=2#46487988)

you realize that this reasoning is the same shit people said when about anti-discrimination laws and that people would just find ways to evade them? and eventually these tactics were gradually stamped out in further decisions.

i don't think the universities will consider this a "nominal win" if they continue to do AA and spend millions defending lawsuits against their patently unconstitutional policy.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5364936&forum_id=2#46488239)

i don't see why you're against this decision anyway as a white prole. i'm a white prole too and it pissed me off that carlton banks motherfuckers got a huge boost but economically disadvantaged people didn't. AA barely moves the need on helping the type of dindus that actually need a boost. go to harvard and see how many dindus are from west baltimore versus how many are the children of biglaw partners.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5364936&forum_id=2#46488497)

CR, the better move would have been to not use any of the few remaining levers of power that are still marginally in GOP hands and just wrack up total losses across the bort on all issues forever (even as the Democrats cheat their way to future election wins anyway and then eventually regain those few remaining levers of power that way).

Thanks for flagging this, Benzo. You really are a true "friend" to us retarded conservatards, I know we aren't smart enough to agree with you on everything, but clearly you have our best interests at heart! ;)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5364936&forum_id=2#46489134)

https://images.app.goo.gl/uhRrR2DqbCGEYEJ46

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5364936&forum_id=2#46487574)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5364936&forum_id=2#46487562)

this is a huge win for libs. a talking point about a problem that doesn’t even exist.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5364936&forum_id=2#46487595)