Date: July 21st, 2023 3:29 PM Author: bearded indian lodge karate
Yea this makes no sense. He’s acting like after a jury trial, which is the final decision, there’s another court that could review that decision and even overturn it.
Date: July 21st, 2023 4:22 PM Author: white startling jew
Is that how I typed it? Doesn’t sound like how I’d write it. Judgment reversed so that we win on 2(d) and should get our fees, but jury verdict still stands (for now)
Date: July 21st, 2023 4:31 PM Author: Autistic cruise ship
How did you "win" on 2(d) when the district court still has to "consider whether costco and the wholesalers purchased 5 hour energy from Living Essentials within approximately the same period of time in light of the record" especially considering the shitty record the district ct. recounted re: 2(a)
Date: July 21st, 2023 4:37 PM Author: white startling jew
Well that’s not an obstacle. Take a look at Judge Gilman’s short dissent. And unfortunately my friend Judge Miller was mistaken in describing it as unexplained — I guess he didn’t see the paragraph of our briefing where the other side’s 30b6 explained the meaning of the columns and rows. Anyway we’ll get this cleared up
Date: July 21st, 2023 5:59 PM Author: white startling jew
Sucks for them, but they'll at least get 100s of $K in promotional payments going forward, unless the defendant cuts off the Costco spigot (which Costco won't allow).