Date: December 23rd, 2008 1:57 PM Author: Free-loading navy tank yarmulke
I think people think this because they hang around tons of jews and professional/lawyer type women. the women in the bronx and brooklyn are pretty good looking (if you like latinas, that is)
I've heard this argument IRL from people who've moved to New York from other areas of the country. The issue is that they tend to think amount of blonde hair plus willingness to forego career and ambition of any sort is the only measure of attractiveness
Date: December 24th, 2008 2:30 PM Author: Mischievous godawful parlor
If you tried leaving your parents basement sometime you would find out there are much better places to find tons of hot blondes. Sweden undeservedly has a rep of having the highest concentration. Proles like you who try to feign worliness perpetuate this myth. HTH
Date: December 23rd, 2008 1:58 PM Author: Disturbing fanboi gaping
There are going to be hot women in NYC b/c of the millions of people there. However, it is a fact that there are more hot women in places with warmer weather. A woman who is hot and intelligent/interesting is always rare.
Date: December 23rd, 2008 2:44 PM Author: contagious doctorate immigrant
The more I read his posts, the more I doubt that PrestigeDiddy even lives here.
There are good things about NYC, but hot women is not one of them. The women in los angeles, san diego, houston, dallas, miami, and even atlanta, are in a different league. They're in great shape, nice tans, awesome bodies with actual tits and ass, and pretty faces.
NYC women are too pale, don't work out that much, and smoke way too much. If you're into dark haired waifish types with bodies similar to a twelve-year old boy, then NYC is your mecca. But otherwise, NYC is the wrong city to be in.
And yes, I've been to brunch in west village plenty of times. Not impressed at all.
Date: December 23rd, 2008 3:39 PM Author: mauve sadistic mother
The West Village and that general area does seem to have a lot of really attractive women. I went to dinner at Little West 12th (kinda in between Meatpacking and West Village) on Friday night, not even the trendiest place on earth and there were lots of *very* attractive women there. Several hot Asian chicks, and a few really skinny blonds. A really hot black girl too.
LA, San Diego, Houston, Dallas, Miami, Atlanta all have attractive women. So does New York, which is my point. Everywhere I go in NY, women with great skin, great figures, stylish, just generally on point.
Date: December 23rd, 2008 3:33 PM Author: mauve sadistic mother
I think it's about type. There are a lot of thinner, brunette women, and exotic/foreign looking women, but I can't remember the last time I saw a playmate-looking girl here (tall, buxom, leggy, ass, toned). People here don't put as much emphasis on being toned, tanning and having T&A I don't think.
Date: December 23rd, 2008 3:39 PM Author: mauve sadistic mother
When was the last time you saw a chick who looked like she would belong in Playboy, or on one of those shitty MTV shows like Sunset Tan? You really can't argue that there are a lot of them here, just like you can't argue that there are a lot of 6'4", built guys here (re: my thread yesterday).
Date: December 23rd, 2008 3:41 PM Author: contagious doctorate immigrant
Yeah, I might see a girl like that every few months. In California and Texas, they're everywhere. This is why I think for most guys, NYC is just really disappointing.
Um, I've been around union square on weekend nights plenty of times, and I don't see girls like the one blue smoke is describing.
Go online and look up pics of playboy playmates: the ones who are blonde, tanned, toned, flat stomach, big tits. How often do you see girls who look like that, here in the city? Honestly, I can't remember; it's definitely been at least six months. In places like LA, vegas, dallas, miami, they're everywhere.
Yeah, no one is saying that NYC does not have attractive women. But blue smoke and I are talking about a specific type, and those women are extremely rare in NYC, perhaps because they're more interested in being on playboy, doing lingerie modeling, or acting, in which case you need to be in LA.
NYC attracts tall super skinny dark haired chicks who want to walk the catwalk. Some guys like that, but for most straight men, including myself, we don't find it appealing.
Date: December 23rd, 2008 4:11 PM Author: mauve sadistic mother
I don't get this ratio. Are you saying 1/8 of women in NYC is a hot playboy looking blond, or 1/8 HOT women is a hot playboy looking blond?
Obviously there are a ton of beautiful women here, I just don't see many who fit that type.
I have a friend who is very attractive and does fit that type... she's about 5'2, thin, D-ish cup, long blond hair, blue eyes and she tried using match.com. She said guys would ALWAYS tell her that she was a pleasant surprise because they don't run into many buxom blonds in the city. (She's from Atlanta).
nyuug has no idea what he's talking about. The 1:8 ratio is way too generous.
As I said in an earlier post, I go out frequently, and I almost never see the girl that Blue Smoke is describing.
I'm not surprised at the reaction to your friend on match. I'll be pleasantly surprised too if I saw a girl who looked like that.
A lot of this is also demographics. If I'm not mistaken, NYC is about 30% jewish, 25% black, 20% latino. So you're going to have very few hot blonde women, as a result.
Date: December 23rd, 2008 4:19 PM Author: mauve sadistic mother
I think the match thing was pretty tacky, but there are a lot of retarded guys on there. I've gotten a few emails from guys who say they've never been with a black girl and want to see what it's like, or like big boobs and stuff like that. Tacky.
Yeah, she's definitely an anomaly for a southern chick. One of my good friends here went to florida undergrad, and a bunch of his guy and girl friends came up to visit NYC. We showed them a good time, but on more than one occasion, they were saying how ugly the people are. One chick said she can't imagine dating NYC guys.
And yes, most of them fit the type we're talking about.
Date: December 23rd, 2008 3:50 PM Author: mauve sadistic mother
You see big titted, tan, toned blonds all the time? In Manhattan? Are you sure you're not hanging out on Long Island or some extension of Long Island, like Penn Station?
Anyway, maybe you do, solely due to the fact that there are 8 million people in NYC, but there are fewer of them here than in other places, like the South, the Southwest, Texas and California.
Playmate type is the most prestigious because the vast majority of men lust after those types of women. And NYC has very few women who fit that mold. What you don't get, is that outside of your narrow circle of "sophisticated" NYC friends, men do not want anorexic chicks who cover themselves in prada and gucci, smoke a pack a day, watch sex and the city reruns, and brunch at fashionable west village spots.
I don't care what you want, the question is are the hot? My answer is yes. Just like I acknowledge playboy types are hot. Hot is hot, no matter what the type.
You're one of the few guys who thinks those types of girls are hot. But it's well established that you're a TTT liberal who tries hard to be a part of the NYC "elite" by going to lame charity benefits full of ugly women.
Well if you limit the question to "what you are looking for," you can say any city doesn't have enough "hot" women. If I limit "hot" to thin, cute curly haired Jewish chicks, I can say Dallas has no "hot" women. Type should be irrelevant when discussing these issues.
ROFL at any guy who thinks thin curly haired jewish chicks are "hot." I admit that NYC has plenty of those women, but NYC has very few hot non-jewish white women.
But you admit that not all hot types are equally represented. So while NYC may have a lot of hot brunettes and waifish types, there are very few playboy playmate types in the city.
Date: December 23rd, 2008 4:20 PM Author: mauve sadistic mother
If you've ever read my threads, you should know that I don't really troll for blond playboy looking chicks.
I just think that's what many of the guys who say the chicks in NYC aren't hot are alluding to. That type seems to be most accessible to American guys.
That aside, I think people in NYC (men and women) are just a bit less attractive overall. Not sure why. Maybe it's because a lot of educated/smart people move here.
Date: December 23rd, 2008 3:42 PM Author: Galvanic fantasy-prone senate
Can you fucking stop it with these threads? Yes, NYC has some beautiful women and it has some ugly women. Just like every other place on the planet. Now go back to your daily existence.
A lot of hot southern blondes move to DC after college to work for GOP congressmen and senators. But with the liberals taking control of the town, expect them to be replaced by ugly dorky jews and asians from ivy league schools.
nyuug, the more you write, the less credibility you have.
UVA attracts hot prestigious southern girls from good families. NYU gets ugly horsefaced jewish girls from long island and jersey who have huge egos and a sense of entitlement.
UVA is like all mediocre looking nova chicks. i can post some examples if you want. NYU chicks have to compete with other regular NYC chicks so they're forced to look good all the fucking time. its great
Date: December 24th, 2008 11:15 AM Author: learning disabled base
NYU, honestly I love NY, but the white women in Virginia are 100X what the NYC women are.
I used to live in the mid-atlantic. Their women are substantially better than ours. They're better looking, they have better personalities, they're family oriented, and they can cook.
Date: December 24th, 2008 11:58 AM Author: learning disabled base
titcr. also, intelligent southern girls do not find a need to talk about "critical theory" and wear stupid glasses. they get actual jobs, rather than becoming "Web designers" or "Artists" or worst of all "Actors". No, not "actresses", "actors". Granted in practice this makes no difference at all as most of them serve tables, rather than tablesses.
Date: December 24th, 2008 9:03 AM Author: Awkward cocky gunner theatre
I agree with Blue Smoke that there are almost no hot blonde
CGWBT types in NYC. But that's mainly due to demographic reasons. There's a lot of jews, latinos, blacks, and asians here, so you're bound to get very few of those plymate types.
But for guys who're into dark haired jewish and latina chicks, NYC would be the perfect place for you.
Date: December 24th, 2008 11:14 AM Author: learning disabled base
The jewesses in NYC are a TTT in decline. May as well go to LI. AT least some of them are good looking.
The white women in NYC are TTT. I love NYC, but our white women are not attractive, they all have fucking attitudes, a lot are flat chested, they're all flat-assed, and none of them can cook.
Some of the Italian women are OK, but that's about it. Southern women are sooooo much better.
I find if you pretty much give up on white women, it makes dating in NY easier.
Date: December 24th, 2008 11:20 AM Author: Awkward cocky gunner theatre
Totally credited. There are so few hot non-jewish white women in NYC. It's almost impossible to see a hot blonde in great shape with actual tits and ass.
Date: December 24th, 2008 11:29 AM Author: Awkward cocky gunner theatre
I went to a SEC school, so it was absolutely disgusting to come to NYC for the first time. The hottest girl I would see at a NYC club/bar would be average at my school.
Date: December 24th, 2008 11:17 AM Author: learning disabled base
It's not the TTT poors. PA is raging poor and the women are still 10X hotter.
The women in NY all have these JAPpy attitudes, even the goy. I think the word's out that ugly bitches who can't cook can come to NYC, act bitchy and still find a husband if they get a prada bag and talk nasally.
Date: December 24th, 2008 11:56 AM Author: Razzle-dazzle sticky associate internal respiration
To be fair,
Literally all that needed to be said here was:
NYC 8= LA 5.
No straight man who's spent time in both cities serious disputes this, and when your city gets pwned by another city that badly in this metric you probably don't have place to be making threads about how unfair it is that you get a bum rap on that front.
Date: December 24th, 2008 1:01 PM Author: Bateful chad
Almost every poster on here agree that NYC doesn't have that many hot white girls, especially blondes. Even that liberal faggot PrestigeDiddy, conceded that point when he was pressed.
Date: December 25th, 2008 11:26 PM Author: angry international law enforcement agency
There are more women of different "types" in NY than there are in most cities. Not every girl in NYC aspires to the same physical ideal, either. In the South and in California, the tan, blonde, large-breasted look is the most prestigious. I don't think that's the same in NYC.
Date: December 25th, 2008 11:30 PM Author: angry international law enforcement agency
I don't think NYC has particularly attractive women, but that's a function of my preference. If you're into thin, fashionable brunettes with a somewhat ethnic or Jewish look, you'll be set in NYC.
Date: December 26th, 2008 12:30 AM Author: jet doobsian range weed whacker
Credited. If you like jewish girls, NYC is your paradise. But for hot white girls, cities like los angeles, dallas, and chicago, are the ideal places to be.
Date: December 26th, 2008 12:42 AM Author: angry international law enforcement agency
Some Jewish girls are hot. I have seen a few Jewish girls with light brown hair, fair-ish skin that tans really well, and blue eyes, nice tits. But none of them are in NYC. It seems like all of the Jewish girls in NYC are of the pasty-skinned, stringy dark brown hair, skinny-fat variety.
Date: December 26th, 2008 12:52 AM Author: angry international law enforcement agency
The hottest girls in NYC are the ones who come from the South or flyover country. Unfortunately, these are the ones with the biggest Sex and the City complexes and they ruin themselves pretty quickly.