Date: January 3rd, 2011 10:34 AM Author: Razzle-dazzle greedy parlour trump supporter
It was fine. I bailed on my friends' plans for a wild sweaty dance party at the last moment and instead went for a mellow dive bar with my neighbors. I probably would've had more fun at the dance party; but I just didn't have the mojo on Friday. All in all it was a good weekend though! :)
Date: January 3rd, 2011 10:50 AM Author: Maniacal legend
"If you're into tiny, waifish planets, go right ahead. But astronomy insiders would never rate Mercury above a 5, they ALL prefer the larger, older gas giants"
Date: January 3rd, 2011 10:53 AM Author: aqua corner
"...And if you'll notice, I almost never troll for planets that are my precise makeup (gas giants). I might troll for larger rocky planets that have certain characteristics that are more often associated with gas giants, but I generally prefer Silicate, Hydrocarbon and Iron planets..."
*Is smug as fuck, thinking this clever gambit defuses all criticisms of my transparent motives*
Date: January 3rd, 2011 11:01 AM Author: Doobsian Cuckold
They troll for their type but don't pretend to be experts on beauty and aesthetics. They also don't act like anyone who disagrees with them is retarded.
Date: January 3rd, 2011 11:09 AM Author: aqua corner
"This column is written by breakingviews.com, an online financial commentary site."
So you get *tri-credit* on an article that was originally written for a much less prestigious website before getting picked up by WSJ and you're acting like your a columnist for the Journal? And then you link to a fucking webcast that you are an *announcer* on that looks like my local Fox News broadcast, only focused on economics?
"I'm not saying I have a Nobel Prize in Economics, but..."
Date: January 3rd, 2011 11:10 AM Author: Arousing Center
what are you talking about? that was 2 articles, not tri-credit, not to mention i was published 20 times in the WSJ!and when did i ever say i was a wsj columnist? still, i don't think you can argue i'm not a business journalist. and btw, this is a national dailt business news show.
Date: January 3rd, 2011 11:01 AM Author: Thriller azure public bath telephone
nutella rarely posts.
gracekelly trolls for shrewy fashiony styley sophisticated chicks and does get bashed. i read it more as shrew lifestyle trolling, not really actual looks trolling.
what does adidas look like? anyways she does not post about what she thinks about other women much.
bs and ruskie def get bashed. also ruskie doesn't post about what she thinks about other women half as often.
I generally think that women who are the exact opposite of me are the most beautiful (dark-skinned, brunette, tall, T&A). But my personal preference is distinct from me chiming in with an opinion on what I think men prefer (Which, for the record, I believe to be medium height, T&A, brunette).
I try not to poast negative stuff about female looks because women take enough shit from the world about their looks day in and day out. Occassionally I'll chime in, but I tend to only point out when I think someone is a hottie mchotpocket.
I don't disagree. But xoxo men can be pretty unforgiving when it comes to assessing a woman's looks as well. Society expects women to be sexy/beautiful/hot/thin; not just other women.
Date: January 3rd, 2011 1:00 PM Author: Odious Disturbing Gunner
XO =/= IRL
Also, society "expects" women to be beautiful in the same way that it "expects" men to be smart/resourceful/successful, so don't act like you're shouldering some unique burden.
Fair enough. Especially credited w/r/t resourceful (which I think embodies a number of traits that society thinks are necessary to be considered masculine).
Date: January 3rd, 2011 1:05 PM Author: Odious Disturbing Gunner
cr, it annoys me how often I hear women pissing and moaning about how unfair the looks-game is to them, while at the same time they have absolutely no expectations from anyone w/r/t career/money/etc and they are actively seeking a successful dood. And sure, men sometimes complain about being expected to be rich + successful, but I dont think we pat ourselves on the back in the same way women do, because we recognize that those expectations are inherent to our value to the opposite sex.
Date: March 11th, 2011 5:33 PM Author: Cerise trust fund indian lodge
because julia doesn't really like skinny blonde white women and this is unacceptable on xoxo. the people who bash her really lack introspection because they themselves refuse to recognize the beauty on non-white women.
i am often bashed as well, but mainly for saying other races of women are attractive, since i find many white women as attractive as well.
Date: March 11th, 2011 5:39 PM Author: dark cerebral school cafeteria sneaky criminal
this is nuts. people think julia's posting on female looks is nauseating not because we're offended she doesn't love our hallowed white wimminz, but because she's such a transparently and persistently insecure troller for herself and is so fucking egregious about it and just will not stop. this thread e.g. has nothing to do with looks and race at all. it's all about pwning a dumb bitch with a ridiculous personality and no perception of how she appears to other people. it has much more in common with how people used to rag on pensive than with people bashing you "for saying other races of women are attractive"
Date: March 11th, 2011 5:42 PM Author: Arousing Center
please explain how i troll for myself, dumbfuck, when i rotuinely rate women who look nothing like me 9+. in fact, i generally give the highest ratings to mulatta and eastern european women.
the only thing transparent in all this is how mad people get when i rate their sacred preferred type(s) lower than they'd like.
Date: March 11th, 2011 5:51 PM Author: dark cerebral school cafeteria sneaky criminal
do you really need me to walk you through why the post i linked to is a good response to your angry assertions that you can't POSSIBLY be trolling for yourself when you praise women who just happen to share a lot of traits you're proud of in your own body? i guess you are. i'm uninterested in pursuing this further. i've observed enough of your battles with other posters to know that you're too stupid to understand a substantive rebuttal when it's presented.
Date: March 11th, 2011 5:53 PM Author: Arousing Center
the irony in your post is worth more than one chuckle. hint: calling me "stupid" as a means to obviate substantive examples does not, in fact, make me seem stupid --it, in fact, raises questions about your inability to present well-formed arguments & substantiation.
Date: March 11th, 2011 5:46 PM Author: Maniacal legend
dude tbf I dont think mulatto/mulatta are the preferred nomenclature. I heard that this term comes from the word mule, and implies the offspring of two species.
Date: March 11th, 2011 5:50 PM Author: Cerise trust fund indian lodge
yeah you really don't. most of the women you troll for aren't middle eastern.
i think a lot of the people on this board just lump all minority women together and say that you're trolling for women who are "like you" because the chick's brunette and doesn't have blue eyes.
liking white women is the standard here, and they assume you must have some sort of angle/ulterior motives if you praise another type of woman. it's really ridiculous.
Date: March 11th, 2011 5:53 PM Author: Arousing Center
tbf, i think they're also mad because i mention what i perceive to be the flaws in the woman, so they get extra-special mad when i say a chick has "no curves" or a "plain face".
Date: March 11th, 2011 5:47 PM Author: dark cerebral school cafeteria sneaky criminal
yes i suppose no one would NOTICE her comments on female beauty if she just posted "9" whenever a picture was presented for rating rather than writing several paragraphs and then getting in fights with people. i guess this meme just came from nowhere. wait i meant racism.